On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:11:51AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 04:51:12PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

quoted

quoted

-       safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS);
+       if (!((cur[2] | target[2]) & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_2_S2S)))
+               safe_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(
+                       FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS, STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

@will, does this look good to you? I can send a v7 with this.

That is an easy way to address Will's observation, makes sense to me.

Ah, but it looks like it can generate an errant view of a EATS that is
neither old or new. Ie value 3, reserved.

I think you should just check if old or new has EATS bit 1 set:

if (!((cur[2] | target[2]) & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_2_S2S)) &&
    !((cur[1] | target[1]) & cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS, 2))))

Which the current driver never does..

The EATS field is completely controlled by the driver. So, we are
safe for now, right?

Should we add this when the driver has the actual support for the
split stage thing?

Thanks
Nicolin