Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: amlogic: add Khadas VIM1S binding
From: neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Date: 2026-01-14 12:06:59
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 1/14/26 11:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 14/01/2026 11:07, Nick Xie wrote:quoted
Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] 于2026年1月14日周三 16:51写道:quoted
On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 02:25:48PM +0800, Nick Xie wrote:quoted
Add devicetree binding for Khadas VIM1S board based on Amlogic S4 S905Y4 SoC. Signed-off-by: Nick Xie <redacted>You still have the same From/SoB mismatch.OK, I will fix it in next version.quoted
quoted
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml index 08d9963fe9259..55663e0f7f915 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.yaml@@ -247,6 +247,12 @@ properties: - amlogic,aq222 - const: amlogic,s4Look herequoted
quoted
quoted
+ - description: Boards with the Amlogic Meson S4 S905Y4 SoC + items: + - enum:Yopu already have exactly such enum with such description, so your compatible goes there. Look - it is called "Boards" - plural.The exist board aq222 is based on SoC S905X2, but the new board vim1s is baed on S905Y4, they are different SoC, so we need to put S905Y4 under S805X2 ?What is the point of having two separate lists with enums ending the same SoC compatible?
It's very usual for SoC vendors to reuse the same SoC design (here Amlogic S4) into multiple different packages, with some different features enabled & so on, and even new version of the die with some bugfixes. We did this in the past for goop reasons, and here it also applies. In fact the currently supported SoC (S805X2) is a stripped down version of the S4 SoC like it was done for the S805X which was aalso a stripped down version of the S905X, with a different IO layout and different internal characteristics even if the die logic was the same. Neil
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ - khadas,vim1s + - const: amlogic,s4And here.quoted
quoted
Best regards, KrzysztofBest regards, Krzysztof