Re: [PATCH rc v4 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
From: Nicolin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2025-12-18 17:35:37
Also in:
linux-iommu, lkml
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 04:47:38PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 08:26:02PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:quoted
STE in a nested case requires both S1 and S2 fields. And this makes the use case different from the existing one. Add coverage for previously failed cases shifting between S2-only and S1+S2 STEs. Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <redacted> --- .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c index 5db14718fdd6..8255a02f4efa 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ static struct mm_struct sva_mm = { enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat { ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS = BIT(0), ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL = BIT(1), + ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED = BIT(2), }; +static void arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, + enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat); + static bool arm_smmu_entry_differs_in_used_bits(const __le64 *entry, const __le64 *used_bits, const __le64 *target,@@ -197,6 +201,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, }; arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss); + if (feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED) { + struct arm_smmu_ste s2ste; + int i; + + arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);Shouldn't that be conditional on "ats_enabled", I see the callers of the new tests already set ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS.
I will fix that. Thanks Nicolin