Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2025-11-10

Re: [REGRESSION] next/master: (build) implicit declaration of function ‘topology_core_has_smt’; did you ...

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-11-10 11:22:20
Also in: kernelci, linux-next, linux-perf-users, regressions

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 07:11:49PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
[verified still present in linux-next 20251107]
[adding CCs]
Should be fixed by 7ab06ea41af5 ("arch_topology: Provide a stub
topology_core_has_smt() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY") in the Arm
perf tree (which is merged into -next).

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help