[PATCH v7 7/7] kselftest/arm64: Add HWCAP test for FEAT_{LS64, LS64_V}
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Date: 2025-11-07 07:22:39
Also in:
kvmarm
Subsystem:
arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), kernel selftest framework, the rest · Maintainers:
Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Shuah Khan, Linus Torvalds
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Add tests for FEAT_{LS64, LS64_V}. Issue related instructions
if feature presents, no SIGILL should be received. When such
instructions operate on Device memory or non-cacheable memory,
we may received a SIGBUS during the test (w/o FEAT_LS64WB).
Just ignore it since we only tested whether the instruction
itself can be issued as expected on platforms declaring the
support of such features.
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
index 3b96d090c5eb..4d41ab10988f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> +#include <linux/auxvec.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> #include <sys/auxv.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
@@ -595,6 +597,67 @@ static void lrcpc3_sigill(void) : "=r" (data0), "=r" (data1) : "r" (src) :); } +static void ignore_signal(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context) +{ + ucontext_t *uc = context; + + uc->uc_mcontext.pc += 4; +} + +static void ls64_sigill(void) +{ + struct sigaction ign, old; + char src[64] __aligned(64) = { 1 }; + + /* + * LS64, LS64_V require target memory to be Device/Non-cacheable (if + * FEAT_LS64WB not supported) and the completer supports these + * instructions, otherwise we'll receive a SIGBUS. Since we are only + * testing the ABI here, so just ignore the SIGBUS and see if we can + * execute the instructions without receiving a SIGILL. Restore the + * handler of SIGBUS after this test. + */ + ign.sa_sigaction = ignore_signal; + ign.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESTART; + sigemptyset(&ign.sa_mask); + sigaction(SIGBUS, &ign, &old); + + register void *xn asm ("x8") = src; + register u64 xt_1 asm ("x0"); + + /* LD64B x0, [x8] */ + asm volatile(".inst 0xf83fd100" : "=r" (xt_1) : "r" (xn) + : "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7"); + + /* ST64B x0, [x8] */ + asm volatile(".inst 0xf83f9100" : : "r" (xt_1), "r" (xn) + : "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7"); + + sigaction(SIGBUS, &old, NULL); +} + +static void ls64_v_sigill(void) +{ + struct sigaction ign, old; + char dst[64] __aligned(64); + + /* See comment in ls64_sigill() */ + ign.sa_sigaction = ignore_signal; + ign.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESTART; + sigemptyset(&ign.sa_mask); + sigaction(SIGBUS, &ign, &old); + + register void *xn asm ("x8") = dst; + register u64 xt_1 asm ("x0") = 1; + register u64 st asm ("x9"); + + /* ST64BV x9, x0, [x8] */ + asm volatile(".inst 0xf829b100" : "=r" (st) : "r" (xt_1), "r" (xn) + : "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7"); + + sigaction(SIGBUS, &old, NULL); +} + static const struct hwcap_data { const char *name; unsigned long at_hwcap;
@@ -1134,6 +1197,22 @@ static const struct hwcap_data { .hwcap_bit = HWCAP3_MTE_STORE_ONLY, .cpuinfo = "mtestoreonly", }, + { + .name = "LS64", + .at_hwcap = AT_HWCAP3, + .hwcap_bit = HWCAP3_LS64, + .cpuinfo = "ls64", + .sigill_fn = ls64_sigill, + .sigill_reliable = true, + }, + { + .name = "LS64_V", + .at_hwcap = AT_HWCAP3, + .hwcap_bit = HWCAP3_LS64_V, + .cpuinfo = "ls64_v", + .sigill_fn = ls64_v_sigill, + .sigill_reliable = true, + }, }; typedef void (*sighandler_fn)(int, siginfo_t *, void *);
--
2.33.0