Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Add SMI reset and clamp for MT8188
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-10-31 12:07:56
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 31/10/2025 07:10, Friday Yang (杨阳) wrote:
On Sat, 2025-10-18 at 18:42 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. On 17/09/2025 14:07, Friday Yang wrote:quoted
Add 'resets' and 'reset-names' properties for SMI LARBs to support SMI reset operations.Not informative...quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory- controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml index 2e7fac4b5094..fc5feb2eac1f 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/mediatek,smi-larb.yaml@@ -70,6 +70,12 @@ properties: description: the hardware id of this larb. It's only requiredwhen this hardware id is not consecutive from its M4U point of view. + resets: + maxItems: 1 + + reset-names: + const: larbIs the reset valid for all existing devices as well? Commit msg does not explain that... it is pretty useless - you say what you did. We see that from the diff. Explain something not obvious.Thanks, I could add more descriptions here, like below: On the MediaTek MT8188 SoC, bus glitches may occur during MTCMOS on/off transitions. To prevent these glitches from causing errors, SMI requires clamp and reset operations. This issue specifically affects the image, camera, and IPE subsystems.
This explains why you need it. But I asked more questions than only "whY". Read the question: "Is the reset valid for all existing devices as well?" Where is the answer for that? I still do not know... Do not reply to only pieces of review.
This change adds the 'resets' and 'reset-names' properties to the SMI LARBs within these subsystems to support the necessary reset operations.
Read again my message: " it is pretty useless - you say what you did" That's the same, drop. So again you just cared to implement only piece of review. Best regards, Krzysztof