Re: [PATCH] arm64, mm: avoid always making PTE dirty in pte_mkwrite()
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2025-10-20 11:04:24
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Hi, Anshuman, Anshuman Khandual [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
On 17/10/25 11:36 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:37:12AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:quoted
Current pte_mkwrite_novma() makes PTE dirty unconditionally. This may mark some pages that are never written dirty wrongly. For example, do_swap_page() may map the exclusive pages with writable and clean PTEs if the VMA is writable and the page fault is for read access. However, current pte_mkwrite_novma() implementation always dirties the PTE. This may cause unnecessary disk writing if the pages are never written before being reclaimed. So, change pte_mkwrite_novma() to clear the PTE_RDONLY bit only if the PTE_DIRTY bit is set to make it possible to make the PTE writable and clean. The current behavior was introduced in commit 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64: Move PTE_RDONLY bit handling out of set_pte_at()"). Before that, pte_mkwrite() only sets the PTE_WRITE bit, while set_pte_at() only clears the PTE_RDONLY bit if both the PTE_WRITE and the PTE_DIRTY bits are set. To test the performance impact of the patch, on an arm64 server machine, run 16 redis-server processes on socket 1 and 16 memtier_benchmark processes on socket 0 with mostly get transactions (that is, redis-server will mostly read memory only). The memory footprint of redis-server is larger than the available memory, so swap out/in will be triggered. Test results show that the patch can avoid most swapping out because the pages are mostly clean. And the benchmark throughput improves ~23.9% in the test. Fixes: 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64: Move PTE_RDONLY bit handling out of set_pte_at()") Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Gavin Shan <redacted> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Yicong Yang <redacted> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h index aa89c2e67ebc..0944e296dd4a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ static inline pmd_t set_pmd_bit(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t prot) static inline pte_t pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_t pte) { pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_WRITE)); - pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY)); + if (pte_sw_dirty(pte)) + pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY)); return pte; }This seems to be the right thing. I recall years ago I grep'ed (obviously not hard enough) and most pte_mkwrite() places had a pte_mkdirty(). But I missed do_swap_page() and possibly others. For this patch: Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> I wonder whether we should also add (as a separate patch):diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c index 830107b6dd08..df1c552ef11c 100644 --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkclean(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); }For completeness, also (and maybe other combinations): WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte))));Adding similar tests to pte_wrprotect().diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c index 830107b6dd08..573632ebf304 100644 --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c@@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ static void __init pte_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite(pte, args->vma)))); WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkclean(pte)))); WARN_ON(!pte_dirty(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkdirty(pte)))); + + WARN_ON(pte_dirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_mkclean(pte)))); + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkdirty(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); + WARN_ON(!pte_write(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte_wrprotect(pte)))); + WARN_ON(pte_write(pte_wrprotect(pte_mkwrite_novma(pte)))); } static void __init pte_advanced_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args)@@ -195,6 +200,9 @@ static void __init pmd_basic_tests(struct pgtable_debug_args *args, int idx) WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite(pmd, args->vma)))); WARN_ON(pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkclean(pmd)))); WARN_ON(!pmd_dirty(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkdirty(pmd)))); + + WARN_ON(!pmd_write(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd_wrprotect(pmd)))); + WARN_ON(pmd_write(pmd_wrprotect(pmd_mkwrite_novma(pmd)))); /* * A huge page does not point to next level page table * entry. Hence this must qualify as pmd_bad().
Thanks! I can add a patch for these tests. Or, do you want to work on it?
quoted
I cc'ed linux-mm in case we missed anything. If nothing raised, I'll queue it next week.
--- Best Regards, Huang, Ying