On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 14:45, Ravi Patel [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
The dt-bindings patch was merged earlier in v3 series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/175664688891.195158.13270877080433356384.b4-ty@linaro.org/ (local) on 31st August)
into respective maintainer repo.
Then I have been asked to drop the applied v3 patches and send rebased v4 series (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/15508cb4-843c-42d1-8854-5eabd79ca0df@kernel.org/ (local))
Since the 4 patches from v3 series has been already merged, I have not the mentioned dependency while sending remaining v4 patches considering
It is going to same maintainer repo and it will be applied in sequence.
For future patches (like artpec-9), I will mention the dependency even it is merged in same repo.
I know what happened, so no need to explain that. Single maintainer
repo doesn't matter, it's irrelevant and you mentioning it means you
didn't read the maintainer soc profiles I asked. You still don't get
the problem about what happened, at least judging by above expansion,
and this means you will repeat the same mistakes.
I will not proceed with further artpec patches until you really
understand how the process works, through existing documentation.
Please do your homework, to reduce the workload on maintainers.