I will fix that in v4.

I just forget to add `Acked-by` after `git format-patch`.
I will re-patch my local tree, add `Acked-by` to commit message,
then `git format-patch`.

I have another question. If there are reviewers or co-authors later,
do I need to add it to the commit message and send it again?
Or should the reviewer or co-author add the message and
continue to deliver the patch?

Thanks!
  Liangbin

Diederik de Haas [off-list ref] 于2025年9月29日周一 18:20写道：

On Mon Sep 29, 2025 at 8:57 AM CEST, Liangbin Lian wrote:

quoted

LinkEase EasePi R1 [1] is a high-performance mini router.
...
[1] https://doc.linkease.com/zh/guide/easepi-r1/hardware.html

Signed-off-by: Liangbin Lian <redacted>
---

Changes in v2:
- Change deprecated "rockchip,system-power-controller" to "system-power-controller"
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925055906.83375-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/ (local)

You received an Acked-by on patch 1 and 2 in v1 of this patch set.
You're supposed to add that to the next/new version(s) or explain why
you choose not to do that (bc f.e. there was a major change, but that
does not seem applicable to those patches).

Cheers,
  Diederik

quoted

Changes in v3:
- Fix typo ('status = "disable"' -> 'status = "disabled"') found by kernel test robot https://lore.kernel.org/all/202509261328.Grjhp029-lkp@intel.com/ (local)
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250925092037.13582-1-jjm2473@gmail.com/ (local)

---

Liangbin Lian (3):
  dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document LinkEase
  dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add LinkEase EasePi R1
  arm64: dts: rockchip: add LinkEase EasePi R1

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml     |   5 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts    | 692 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 700 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-easepi-r1.dts


base-commit: d0ca0df179c4b21e2a6c4a4fb637aa8fa14575cb