Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 6 authors, 2025-09-24

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/thp: fix MTE tag mismatch when replacing zero-filled subpages

From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-09-22 02:36:38
Also in: linux-mediatek, linux-mm, lkml, stable

On 21 Sep 2025, at 22:14, Lance Yang wrote:
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>

When both THP and MTE are enabled, splitting a THP and replacing its
zero-filled subpages with the shared zeropage can cause MTE tag mismatch
faults in userspace.

Remapping zero-filled subpages to the shared zeropage is unsafe, as the
zeropage has a fixed tag of zero, which may not match the tag expected by
the userspace pointer.

KSM already avoids this problem by using memcmp_pages(), which on arm64
intentionally reports MTE-tagged pages as non-identical to prevent unsafe
merging.

As suggested by David[1], this patch adopts the same pattern, replacing the
memchr_inv() byte-level check with a call to pages_identical(). This
leverages existing architecture-specific logic to determine if a page is
truly identical to the shared zeropage.

Having both the THP shrinker and KSM rely on pages_identical() makes the
design more future-proof, IMO. Instead of handling quirks in generic code,
we just let the architecture decide what makes two pages identical.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca2106a3-4bb2-4457-81af-301fd99fbef4@redhat.com (local)

Cc: <redacted>
Reported-by: Qun-wei Lin <redacted>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/a7944523fcc3634607691c35311a5d59d1a3f8d4.camel@mediatek.com (local)
Fixes: b1f202060afe ("mm: remap unused subpages to shared zeropage when splitting isolated thp")
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
---
Tested on x86_64 and on QEMU for arm64 (with and without MTE support),
and the fix works as expected.
From [1], I see you mentioned RISC-V also has the address masking feature.
Is it affected by this? And memcmp_pages() is only implemented by ARM64
for MTE. Should any arch with address masking always implement it to avoid
the same issue?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 mm/huge_memory.c | 15 +++------------
 mm/migrate.c     |  8 +-------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 32e0ec2dde36..28d4b02a1aa5 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -4104,29 +4104,20 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static bool thp_underused(struct folio *folio)
 {
 	int num_zero_pages = 0, num_filled_pages = 0;
-	void *kaddr;
 	int i;

 	for (i = 0; i < folio_nr_pages(folio); i++) {
-		kaddr = kmap_local_folio(folio, i * PAGE_SIZE);
-		if (!memchr_inv(kaddr, 0, PAGE_SIZE)) {
-			num_zero_pages++;
-			if (num_zero_pages > khugepaged_max_ptes_none) {
-				kunmap_local(kaddr);
+		if (pages_identical(folio_page(folio, i), ZERO_PAGE(0))) {
+			if (++num_zero_pages > khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
 				return true;
-			}
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * Another path for early exit once the number
 			 * of non-zero filled pages exceeds threshold.
 			 */
-			num_filled_pages++;
-			if (num_filled_pages >= HPAGE_PMD_NR - khugepaged_max_ptes_none) {
-				kunmap_local(kaddr);
+			if (++num_filled_pages >= HPAGE_PMD_NR - khugepaged_max_ptes_none)
 				return false;
-			}
 		}
-		kunmap_local(kaddr);
 	}
 	return false;
 }
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index aee61a980374..ce83c2c3c287 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -300,9 +300,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
 					  unsigned long idx)
 {
 	struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx);
-	bool contains_data;
 	pte_t newpte;
-	void *addr;

 	if (PageCompound(page))
 		return false;
@@ -319,11 +317,7 @@ static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
 	 * this subpage has been non present. If the subpage is only zero-filled
 	 * then map it to the shared zeropage.
 	 */
-	addr = kmap_local_page(page);
-	contains_data = memchr_inv(addr, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
-	kunmap_local(addr);
-
-	if (contains_data)
+	if (!pages_identical(page, ZERO_PAGE(0)))
 		return false;

 	newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(my_zero_pfn(pvmw->address),
-- 
2.49.0
The changes look good to me. Thanks. Acked-by: Zi Yan [off-list ref]

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help