Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 16 authors, 2025-10-06

Re: [TECH TOPIC] Reaching consensus on CONFIG_HIGHMEM phaseout

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2025-09-09 22:40:02
Also in: imx, linux-mips, linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml

On September 9, 2025 3:24:29 PM PDT, Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 14:39, H. Peter Anvin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
1 GB systems used highmem too, sadly. And 1 GB was the norm for a big chuck of the late 32-bit era.
Well, while on x86 1GB systems did use highmem, they'd typically not
use very much of it.

IOW, they'd have about 900MB as lowmem (ok, I think it was 896MB to be
exact), with something like 120MB highmem.

So they'd either lose a bit of memory, or they'd use the 2G:2G split.

Or - and I think this is the main point - they'd stay on old kernels
like the ancient museum pieces they are.

I'm not convinced it makes sense to have a modern kernel on a museum piece.

        Linus
Certainly. And the 2:2 split is probably the right thing for the old machines anyway.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help