On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:47:50 -0400
Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

 		iter->evt_cpu = cpu;
+		iter->evt = (struct remote_event_hdr *)&rb_evt->array[1];  

Hmm, shouldn't this use ring_buffer_event_data(rb_evt) instead?

If the events get big, then it would be array[2]. But the
ring_buffer_event_data() hides that detail.

Ahh, looking at the patch 10, it is always array[1].

Still should use a helper function instead of exposing the internals like
this.

-- Steve