Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2025-09-09

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] PCI: imx6: Add a method to handle CLKREQ# override active low

From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Date: 2025-09-08 16:32:44
Also in: imx, linux-pci, lkml

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:19:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:26:11AM GMT, Frank Li wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:36:02AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 04:10:48PM GMT, Richard Zhu wrote:
quoted
The CLKREQ# is an open drain, active low signal that is driven low by
the card to request reference clock.

Since the reference clock may be required by i.MX PCIe host too.
Add some info on why the refclk is needed by the host.
quoted
To make
sure this clock is available even when the CLKREQ# isn't driven low by
the card(e.x no card connected), force CLKREQ# override active low for
i.MX PCIe host during initialization.
CLKREQ# override is not a spec defined feature. So you need to explain what it
does first.
quoted
The CLKREQ# override can be cleared safely when supports-clkreq is
present and PCIe link is up later. Because the CLKREQ# would be driven
low by the card in this case.
Why do you need to depend on 'supports-clkreq' property? Don't you already know
if your platform supports CLKREQ# or not? None of the upstream DTS has the
'supports-clkreq' property set and the NXP binding also doesn't enable this
property.
It is history reason. Supposed all the boards which supports L1SS need set
'supports-clkreq' in dts. L1SS require board design use open drain connect
RC's clk-req and EP's clk-req together, which come from one ECN of PCI
spec.

But most M.2 slot now, which support L1SS, so most platform default enable
L1SS or default 'supports-clkreq' on.

Ideally, 'supports-clkreq' should use revert logic like 'clk-req-broken'.
but 'supports-clkreq' already come into stardard PCIe binding now.

One of i.MX95 boards use standard PCIe slot, PIN 12
12	CLKREQ#	Ground	Clock Request Signal[26]
which is reserved at old PCIe standard, so some old PCIe card float this
pin.
Ok. IIUC, i.MX platforms doesn't always support CLKREQ#, as the pin might not be
wired on some connectors. So if the driver turns off the override, CLKREQ# will
be driven high, but the endpoint wouldn't get a chance to drive it low and it
CLKREQ# will be float and pull up by pull up resistor. The old endpoint
(PCIe standard slot) float this pin also because it is reversed at old
PCIe standard. So ref clock is off at that case.
won't receive the refclk.

Is my understanding correct?
Basic is correct with some small problem.

It is caused by two common PCIe problem.
- stadarnd PCIe slot define change PIN12 from reserved to CLKREQ#, which is
ECN, before ECN, all EP device float this pin. after ECN, EP device pull
this pin down.
- use logic [2] to design boards, which just impact L1SS, the basic function
should work.

Frank
I'm wondering in those cases, why can't you keep the CLKREQ# pin to be in
active low state by defining the initial pinctrl state in DT? Can't you change
the pinctrl state of CLKREQ#?
quoted
So I think most dts in kernel tree should add 'supports-clkreq' property
if they use M.2 and connect CLK_REQ# as below [1]
============================================
              VCC
              ---
               |
               R (10K)
               |
CLK_REQ# (RC)------ CLK_REQ#(EP)

NOT add supports-clkreq if connect as below [2]
==========================================

CLK_REQ# (RC)  ---> |---------|
                    | OR GATE | ---> control ref clock
CLK_REQ#(EP)   ---> |-------- |

quoted
So I'm wondering how you are suddenly using this property. The property implies
that when not set to true, CLKREQ# is not supported by the platform. So when the
driver starts using this property, all the old DTS based platforms are not going
to release CLKREQ# from driving low, so L1SS will not be entered for them. Do
you really want it to happen?
Actually, some old board use [2]. we will add supports-clkreq if board
design use [1], so correct reflect board design.
Ok, thanks for clarifying.

- Mani

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help