Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 2 authors, 2025-09-08

Re: [PATCH rfcv1 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-08-27 18:21:29
Also in: linux-iommu, linux-patches, lkml

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 06:25:37PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
+typedef struct arm_smmu_invs *(*invs_fn)(struct arm_smmu_invs *old_invs,
+					 struct arm_smmu_invs *invs);
no reason to pass in fn, this always just calls it as the last thing
so the caller can do it..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static struct arm_smmu_invs *arm_smmu_build_invs(
+	struct arm_smmu_invs *old_invs, struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
+	struct arm_smmu_master *master, bool ats, ioasid_t ssid, invs_fn fn)
+{
+	const bool e2h = master->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H;
+	const bool nesting = smmu_domain->nest_parent;
+	struct arm_smmu_inv *cur = master->invs->inv;
+	size_t num_invs = 1;
+	size_t i;
+
+	switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
+	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_SVA:
+	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
+		cur->smmu = master->smmu;
+		cur->type = INV_TYPE_S1_ASID;
+		cur->id = smmu_domain->cd.asid;
+		cur->size_opcode = e2h ? CMDQ_OP_TLBI_EL2_VA :
+					 CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_VA;
+		cur->nsize_opcode = e2h ? CMDQ_OP_TLBI_EL2_ASID :
+					  CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ASID;
+		break;
+	case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
+		cur->smmu = master->smmu;
+		cur->type = INV_TYPE_S2_VMID;
+		cur->id = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid;
+		cur->size_opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_S2_IPA;
+		cur->nsize_opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_S12_VMALL;
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ON(true);
+		return old_invs;
Return ERR_PTR, it makes the error flows possibly wrong or at least over
complex to return something that shouldn't be freed.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	}
+
+	/* Range-based invalidation requires the leaf pgsize for calculation */
+	if (master->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_RANGE_INV)
+		cur->pgsize = __ffs(smmu_domain->domain.pgsize_bitmap);
+
+	/* All the nested S1 ASIDs have to be flushed when S2 parent changes */
+	if (nesting) {
+		cur = &master->invs->inv[num_invs++];
Don't do both 'cur as an iterator' and 'num_invs as the
location'. Delete num_invs entirely and just use cur.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+		cur->smmu = master->smmu;
+		cur->type = INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_S1_CLEAR;
+		cur->id = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid;
+		cur->size_opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ALL;
+		cur->nsize_opcode = CMDQ_OP_TLBI_NH_ALL;
+	}
+
+	if (ats) {
+		for (i = 0, cur++; i < master->num_streams; i++) {
+			cur->smmu = master->smmu;
+			/*
+			 * If an S2 used as a nesting parent is changed we have
+			 * no option but to completely flush the ATC.
+			 */
+			cur->type = nesting ? INV_TYPE_ATS_FULL : INV_TYPE_ATS;
+			cur->id = master->streams[i].id;
+			cur->ssid = ssid;
+			cur->size_opcode = CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV;
+			cur->nsize_opcode = CMDQ_OP_ATC_INV;
+		}
+		num_invs += master->num_streams;
+	}
+
+	master->invs->num_invs = num_invs;
Like this:

	master->invs->num_invs = cur - master->invs->inv;
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_invs(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
+					struct arm_smmu_domain *new_smmu_domain)
+{
How about a comment:

/*
 * During attachment the invalidation lists on the two domains are sequenced:
 *  1. old domain is invalidating master
 *  2. new and old domain are invalidating master
 *  3. new domain is invalidating master
 *
 * This uses two updated invalidation lists, one with master added to new domain
 * and one with master removed from old domain. Prepare these lists in advance
 * of changing anything. arm_smmu_asid_lock ensures that the invalidation list
 * in the domains doesn't change while we are sequencing to update it.
 */
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	struct arm_smmu_domain *old_smmu_domain =
+		to_smmu_domain_devices(state->old_domain);
+	struct arm_smmu_master *master = state->master;
+	bool blocking = false;
+
+	/* A re-attach case doesn't need to update invs array */
+	if (new_smmu_domain == old_smmu_domain)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (new_smmu_domain) {
This if wants a comment, it is tricky:

	/*
	 * At this point a NULL domain indicates the domain doesn't use the
	 * IOTLB, see to_smmu_domain_devices().
	 */
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+		state->new_domain_oinvs = rcu_dereference_protected(
+			new_smmu_domain->invs,
+			lockdep_is_held(&arm_smmu_asid_lock));
+		state->new_domain_ninvs = arm_smmu_build_invs(
+			state->new_domain_oinvs, new_smmu_domain, master,
+			state->ats_enabled, state->ssid, arm_smmu_invs_add);
+		if (IS_ERR(state->new_domain_ninvs))
+			return PTR_ERR(state->new_domain_ninvs);
+		state->new_domain_invs = &new_smmu_domain->invs;
+		blocking = new_smmu_domain->domain.type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_BLOCKED;
+	}
+
+	if (old_smmu_domain) {
+		state->old_domain_oinvs = rcu_dereference_protected(
+			old_smmu_domain->invs,
+			lockdep_is_held(&arm_smmu_asid_lock));
+		state->old_domain_ninvs = arm_smmu_build_invs(
+			state->old_domain_oinvs, old_smmu_domain, master,
+			master->ats_enabled, state->ssid, arm_smmu_invs_del);
+		if (IS_ERR(state->old_domain_ninvs)) {
Then here, as per the last email, just get rid of invs_del and use
the scratch list master->invs for the next step. So all this goes away:

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help