Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: samsung: add Exynos ACPM clock driver
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-08-24 18:09:10
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 19/08/2025 13:45, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
+
+static int acpm_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+ unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+ struct acpm_clk *clk = to_acpm_clk(hw);
+
+ return clk->handle->ops.dvfs_ops.set_rate(clk->handle,
+ clk->acpm_chan_id, clk->id, rate);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops acpm_clk_ops = {
+ .recalc_rate = acpm_clk_recalc_rate,
+ .round_rate = acpm_clk_round_rate,This should be determine_rate. Check recent patchset from Brian Masney. I applied the samsung bits from it to samsung soc tree. ...
+ +static int __init acpm_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
module probe for sure should not be __init.
+{
+ const struct acpm_clk_match_data *match_data;
+ const struct acpm_handle *acpm_handle;
+ struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+ struct clk_hw **hws;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct acpm_clk *aclks;
+ unsigned int acpm_chan_id;
+ int i, err, count;
+
+ acpm_handle = devm_acpm_get_by_node(dev, dev->parent->of_node);
+ if (IS_ERR(acpm_handle))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(acpm_handle),
+ "Failed to get acpm handle.\n");
+
+ match_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!match_data)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
+ "Failed to get match data.\n");
+
+ count = match_data->nr_clks;
+ acpm_chan_id = match_data->acpm_chan_id;
+
+ clk_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, hws, count),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!clk_data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ clk_data->num = count;
+ hws = clk_data->hws;
+
+ aclks = devm_kcalloc(dev, count, sizeof(*aclks), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!aclks)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ const struct acpm_clk_variant *variant = &match_data->clks[i];
+ struct acpm_clk *aclk = &aclks[i];
+
+ hws[i] = &aclk->hw;
+
+ aclk->id = variant->id;
+ aclk->handle = acpm_handle;
+ aclk->acpm_chan_id = acpm_chan_id;
+
+ err = acpm_clk_ops_init(dev, aclk, variant->name);
+ if (err)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
+ "Failed to register clock.\n");
+ }
+
+ return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
+ clk_data);
+}
+
+#define ACPM_CLK(_id, cname) \
+ { \
+ .id = _id, \
+ .name = cname, \
+ }
+
+static const struct acpm_clk_variant gs101_acpm_clks[] __initconst = {This goes to top of the file, after struct declarations.
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_MIF, "mif"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_INT, "int"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_CPUCL0, "cpucl0"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_CPUCL1, "cpucl1"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_CPUCL2, "cpucl2"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_G3D, "g3d"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_G3DL2, "g3dl2"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_TPU, "tpu"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_INTCAM, "intcam"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_TNR, "tnr"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_CAM, "cam"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_MFC, "mfc"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_DISP, "disp"),
+ ACPM_CLK(CLK_ACPM_DVFS_BO, "b0"),
+};
+
+static const struct acpm_clk_match_data acpm_clk_gs101 __initconst = {Are you going to have more of such clk_match_data? More variants?
+ .clks = gs101_acpm_clks,
+ .nr_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(gs101_acpm_clks),
+ .acpm_chan_id = 0,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id acpm_clk_ids[] __initconst = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "google,gs101-acpm-dvfs-clocks",
+ .data = &acpm_clk_gs101,
+ },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, acpm_clk_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver acpm_clk_driver __refdata = {__refdata feels wrong here. There is a long standing issue with Samsung clock drivers - I sent a patchset for that but it did failed testing. But your code is even simpler - no CLK_OFDECLARE - so why is this refdata? Best regards, Krzysztof