RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: dwc: Remove the L1SS check before putting the link into L2
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Date: 2025-08-22 09:07:12
Also in:
imx, linux-pci, lkml
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> Sent: 2025年8月22日 16:44 To: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; jingoohan1@gmail.com; l.stach@pengutronix.de; lpieralisi@kernel.org; kwilczynski@kernel.org; mani@kernel.org; robh@kernel.org; bhelgaas@google.com; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Hongxing Zhu [off-list ref] Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] PCI: dwc: Remove the L1SS check before putting the link into L2 Since this L1SS check is just an encapsulation problem, and the ASPM shouldn't leak out here. Remove the L1SS check during L2 entry. Fixes: 4774faf854f5 ("PCI: dwc: Implement generic suspend/resume functionality") Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.cb/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c index 952f8594b5012..1e130091d62a0 100644--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c@@ -1009,13 +1009,6 @@ int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci) u32 val; int ret; - /* - * If L1SS is supported, then do not put the link into L2 as some - * devices such as NVMe expect low resume latency. - */ - if (dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL) &PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_ASPM_L1) - return 0; -
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c@@ -1005,7 +1005,6 @@ static int dw_pcie_pme_turn_off(struct dw_pcie *pci) int dw_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct dw_pcie *pci) { - u8 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
It's my fault that one line is missing to be deleted. This change would be added later with other review comments later. Best Regards Richard Zhu
if (pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off) {
pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off(&pci->pp);
} else {
--
2.37.1