Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c: pxa: prevent calling of the generic recovery init code
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2025-08-17 15:54:01
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml, stable
On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
2025. 08. 13. 17:28 keltezéssel, Russell King (Oracle) írta:quoted
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:quoted
2025. 08. 13. 15:10 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:quoted
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:36:45PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:quoted
2025. 08. 11. 22:26 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:quoted
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:49:56PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:...quoted
quoted
TBH this sounds to me like trying to hack the solution and as you pointed out the problem is in pinctrl state changes. I think it may affect not only I2C case.It is not an error in the pinctrl code. I have checked and even fixed a few bugs in that.quoted
And I didn't get how recovery code affects the initialisation (enumeration).Without the fix, it is not possible to initiate a transaction on the bus, which in turn prevents enumeration.But why? As you said below the first pin control state is changed during the probe, which is fine, and the culprit one happens on the recovery.Erm, no. Both happens during probe, before the I2C core tries to enumerate the devices on the bus.quoted
Why is recovery involved in probe? This is quite confusing...Let me try to explain it differently. Here is the simplified call chain: i2c_pxa_probe() ... i2c_pxa_init_recovery() pinctrl_select_state() <- selects GPIO state pinctrl_select_state() <- selects default (I2C) state ... i2c_add_numbered_adapter() i2c_register_adapter() ... i2c_init_recovery() i2c_gpio_init_recovery() i2c_gpio_init_generic_recovery() pinctrl_select_state() <- selects GPIO state*** ... pinctrl_select_state() <- selects default (I2C) state ... bus_for_each_drv() __process_new_adapter() i2c_do_add_adapter() i2c_detect() <- enumerates the devices The culprit is the first pinctrl_select_state() call in i2c_gpio_init_generic_recovery() marked with '***'. That call causes the controller to go stuck, which makes it impossible to transfer anything on the bus.Probably because when GPIO state is selected, the I2C bus pins end up being set low, which the I2C controller sees, so it thinks there's another device communicating on the bus.Yes, it seems so. When GPIO state is selected, the bits in the Bus Monitor register which are continuously reflecting the value of the SCL and SDA pins contains zeros. Additionally, the Status register indicates an 'Early Bus Busy' condition, which means that 'The SCL or SDA line is low, without a Start condition'.quoted
I could be wrong, as I don't have the hardware to hand to research the issue again. I have a vague memory that the GPIO state must _always_ reflect the actual pin state before switching to it to avoid glitches and avoid inadvertently changing the I2C controller state.Unfortunately, it only helps to avoid glitches on the external lines. At least, in the current case the controller hungs no matter which value combination is being set on the GPIO pins before switching to GPIO state.
Note that my original i2c-pxa recovery implementation was proven functional on the uDPU, both by myself and Telus. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!