Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 7 authors, 2025-09-09

Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc-som: Update dma-ranges for PCIe

From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Date: 2025-08-08 12:03:46
Also in: linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-pci, linux-renesas-soc, lkml


On 08.08.2025 14:44, Biju Das wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Sent: 08 August 2025 12:28
.org; Claudiu Beznea
quoted
[off-list ref]; wsa+renesas [off-list ref]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc-som: Update dma-ranges for PCIe

Hi, Biju,

On 09.07.2025 08:05, Biju Das wrote:
quoted
Hi Claudiu Beznea,
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Sent: 08 July 2025 11:10
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc-som:
Update dma-ranges for PCIe

Hi, Biju,

On 07.07.2025 11:18, Biju Das wrote:
quoted
Hi Claudiu,
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Sent: 04 July 2025 17:14
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg3s-smarc-som:
Update dma-ranges for PCIe

From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>

The first 128MB of memory is reserved on this board for secure area.
Update the PCIe dma-ranges property to reflect this.
I see R-Car PCIe dma-ranges[1] and [2] maps all possible DDR area supported by the SoC?
Do we need to make board specific as well there?
I'm not familiar with R-Car, but if there are ranges reserved for
other purposes, I think we should reflect it in board specific device trees.

Already Linux has this DDR info[1]. Linux provides DMA memory only from this region.
What we provide though dma-ranges DT property is setup in the PCI controller register corresponding to
the AXI windows. It is the same in case of R-Car (as of my investigation on driver).
quoted
In your testing, have you faced any issue like system allocated DMA
region other than [1] and you don't want to use it, then the changes are ok??
I haven't currently encounter any issues.

As the values passed though the dma-ranges DT property are setup in the controller register for AXI
windows, and the DMA endpoints can act as bus masters, to avoid any issue where the DMA endpoints may
corrupt memory specific to the secure area, I chose to update the "dma-ranges" though board specific
bindings (to reflect the presence of the secure area and tell the PCIe controller to not use it).
quoted
Not sure, PCIe can work on internal memory such as SRAM?
Inbound window is RAM, outbound window is a PCIe specific memory described though "ranges" DT property.
You mean SRAM cannot work on PCIe subsystem and work only for DRAM
This PCIe driver uses the PCIe specific memory (named "PCIe area" in Figure
5.2 Overall Address Space or RZ/G3S HW manual) and DRAM.
that is the reason you are not defining SRAM region in "dma-ranges". Am I correct?
The DRAM region is described though dma-ranges, the PCIe memory is
described through ranges property. The above is from this series:

dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0 0x48000000 0 0x48000000 0x0 0x38000000>;
ranges = <0x02000000 0 0x30000000 0 0x30000000 0 0x8000000>;

Thank you,
Claudiu
Cheers,
Biju
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help