Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ROCK 2A/2F, Sige1 and NanoPi Zero2
From: Yao Zi <hidden>
Date: 2025-07-14 01:00:24
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, lkml
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Alex Bee wrote:
Hi Jonas,quoted
Hi Alex, On 7/13/2025 9:13 PM, Alex Bee wrote:quoted
Hi list, Hi Jonas,quoted
This series adds dt-bindings and initial device tree for the following Rockchip RK3528A boards: - Radxa ROCK 2A/2F - ArmSoM Sige1 - FriendlyElec NanoPi Zero2this only sub-related to this series: Is there any particular reason, why we call the compatible "rockchip,rk3528" and not "rockchip,rk3528a"? From what I can see all boards currently supported (and those in this series) are having the RK3528A version of the SoC. I didn't follow the development here, but there are differences - I did a quick compare of the datasheets of those two SoC versions - it looks like RK3528 version has USB3-DRD controller, while RK3528A has USB3 host-only controller. Also it seems to have different video codec IPs and the DRAM controller additionally supports LPDDR4X.What datasheet versions did you check? I can only find: - RK3528 Rev 1.0 (2023-05-22) - RK3528A Rev 1.2 (2024-04-10)I used 2023-07-12 Revision V1.0 which didn't include these features - which is interesting: Why would a SoC vendor not try to sell all features in the first place :) But I now double checked in 2025-05-12 Revision 1.4 and you are right: It appears there also for RK3528A. The only difference I could now make out by comparing v1.4 of both versions is the cipher engine: RK3528 additionally supports "SM2/SM3/SM4 cipher" - but still it exists and additionally the different video codec (if mpp userspace library is correct about that). Anyway: My question was more about: Why didn't we choose the correct compatible from the beginning? And of course the dts files would have to be renamed if the compatible is changed, as they are named according to their SoC-compatible.
Just like what Jonas said, I was not aware of any technical documentation at the time of writing the basic devicetree, and even for now the only datasheet I manage to find is the 2023 revision about RK3528 without A suffix, so I didn't realize the difference between RK3528 and RK3528A, but just followed the vendor code and devicetree[1], where only RK3528 is mentioned :-( Regards, Yao Zi [1]: https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel, branch develop-5.10
Regards, Alexquoted
And both list LPDDR4X support and the A-variant seem to list USB3-DRD support, did you mix them up above? I think these SoCs are similar to rk3228/rk3229, rk3228h/rk3328 and now rk3528/rk3528a, in that only the second variant support VP9 decoding. Use of rockchip,rk3528a compatible could be something to change, could also be something that bootloader set at runtime, similar to what it does for rk3288w.quoted
I guess it would be good to discuss this before this series is merged, because re-naming *.dts files after they have been in a release is somewhat impossible.I think renaming the device tree files is unnecessary, as there seem to be very little difference. All boards I have come across are currently RK3528A variants. How would we treat the Radxa E20C?, it is not named rk3528-radxa-e20c.dtb, yet uses the A-variant. For mainline U-Boot I have included printing out the SoC-variant, however the compatible is not adjusted: Model: Radxa E20C SoC: RK3528A DRAM: 2 GiB Regards, Jonasquoted
Regards, Alexquoted
The bt/wifi_reg_on pins are described in the device tree using rfkill-gpio nodes. Changes in v3: - Rename led nodes to led-0/led-1 - Remove pinctrl* props from sdio0 - Collect a-b tags Changes in v2: - Limit sdmmc max-frequency to 100 MHz on ROCK 2A/2F - Drop clock-output-names prop from rtc node on Sige1 and NanoPi Zero2 - Drop regulator-boot-on from usb 2.0 host regulators on Sige1 - Add bluetooth and wifi nodes on Sige1 - Collect t-b tag for NanoPi Zero2 These boards can be booted from emmc or sd-card using the U-Boot 2025.07 generic-rk3528 target or work-in-progress patches for these boards [1]. For working bluetooth on ArmSoM Sige1 the patch "arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix UART DMA support for RK3528" [2] is required. [1] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/contributors/kwiboo/u-boot/-/commits/rk3528 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250709210831.3170458-1-jonas@kwiboo.se (local) Jonas Karlman (6): dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 2A/2F arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Radxa ROCK 2A/2F dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add ArmSoM Sige1 arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ArmSoM Sige1 dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add FriendlyElec NanoPi Zero2 arm64: dts: rockchip: Add FriendlyElec NanoPi Zero2 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 17 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 4 + .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-armsom-sige1.dts | 465 ++++++++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-nanopi-zero2.dts | 340 +++++++++++++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2.dtsi | 293 +++++++++++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2a.dts | 82 +++ .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2f.dts | 10 + 7 files changed, 1211 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-armsom-sige1.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-nanopi-zero2.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2.dtsi create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2a.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528-rock-2f.dts