Hi Rob, Andy,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:49:36 -0500
Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:33 AM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:22:45AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:47:58PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES))
I really want CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES to go away at some point, not
add more users.
I think this should instead check for specific platforms not with
kconfig symbols but DT properties. For ce4100, you can just check the
root compatible string. For OLPC, there isn't a root compatible (in the
DT I have). You could check for /architecture == OLPC instead. There's
some virtualization guests using DT now too. I would think their DT's
are simple enough to avoid any fw_devlink issues.
I don't think this is good approach. The above check is more reliable in my
opinion.
I'm fine with any solution that doesn't add a
CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES which we can't remove. Adding it was a
kick the can down the road to merge the support worry the mixed
usecase (on ACPI systems) later. It's now later.
quoted
quoted
Alternatively, we could perhaps make x86 fw_devlink default off
For my (little) knowledge I believe this is not feasible anymore.
Some x86 code (drivers) relies on fw_devlink nowadays. But take
this with grain of salt, I may be way mistaken.
Doesn't the CONFIG_X86 check disable it?
Rob
Filtering out by Kconfig seems a no-go:
- Check for CONFIG_OLPC of CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CE as proposed in v1
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250407145546.270683-12-herve.codina@bootlin.com/ (local))
was a no-go from Andy
- Check for CONFIG_PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES as proposed here is a no-go from
Rob
I will follow Rob's suggestion based on DT properties. With a DT property
list, it would be easier to add more x86 fw_delink broken system in the list
of the system to exclude.
Best regards,
Hervé