Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: iommu: verisilicon: Add binding for VSI IOMMU
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>
Date: 2025-06-16 15:51:19
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-rockchip, lkml
Le 16/06/2025 à 17:42, Conor Dooley a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 05:30:44PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:quoted
Le 16/06/2025 à 17:14, Conor Dooley a écrit :quoted
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 04:55:50PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:quoted
Add a device tree binding for the Verisilicon (VSI) IOMMU. This IOMMU sits in front of hardware encoder and decoder blocks on SoCs using Verisilicon IP, such as the Rockchip RK3588. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com> --- .../bindings/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yaml | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yamldiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..acef855fc61d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iommu/verisilicon,iommu.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Verisilicon IOMMU + +maintainers: + - Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com> + +description: |+ + A Versilicon iommu translates io virtual addresses to physical addresses for + its associated video decoder. + +properties: + compatible: + oneOf: + - items: + - const: verisilicon,iommuYou're missing a soc-specific compatible at the very least here, but is there really no versioning on the IP at all? I'd be surprised if verisilicon only produced exactly one version of an iommu IP.I only aware this version of the iommu for the moment."for the moment", yeah. Is there any information that could be used to version this available?
The hardware block isn't documented in the TRM so I don't know if there is a version field or something like that.
quoted
Does adding verisilicon,rk3588-iommu sound good for you ?It'd be "rockchip,rk3588-iommu", but sure.
"rockchip,rk3588-iommu" is already use for other MMUs in rk3588.