Hi Frank,

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:57:46AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:

On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 02:43:07PM +0000, John Ernberg wrote:

quoted

NXP SoCs like the iMX8QM, iMX8QXP or iMX8DXP use power domains for
resource management.

Allow specifying them for such SoCs.

suggest comment:

Add compatible string fsl,imx8qm-caam, and allow power-domains for it. Keep
the same restriction for others.

Ack.

quoted

Signed-off-by: John Ernberg <redacted>

---

v3:
 - Fix warnings discovered by Rob Herring's bot
 - Declare the compatibles correctly (Krzysztof Kozlowski)

v2:
 - Adjust commit message (Frank Li)
 - Only allow power-domains when compatible with imx8qm (Frank Li)
---
 .../bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml
index 75afa441e019..a4ada0e2d97c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl,sec-v4.0.yaml

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - enum:
               - fsl,imx6ul-caam
+              - fsl,imx8qm-caam

suggest add fsl,imx8qxp-caam, fsl,imx8dxl-caam also

While I know the DXL comes with the CAAM, I don't have access to any boards
with a DXL on it nor the DXL security manual. So I cannot validate any
changes I would make for the DXL variant.

I propose to keep the DXL out of this patch set, is that ok for you?

I'll add a compat for the QXP in V4.

Thanks! // John Ernberg

Frank