Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] KVM: arm64: Add a range to __pkvm_host_share_guest()
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-05-16 13:10:10
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
On Fri, 09 May 2025 14:16:59 +0100, Vincent Donnefort [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In preparation for supporting stage-2 huge mappings for np-guest. Add a nr_pages argument to the __pkvm_host_share_guest hypercall. This range supports only two values: 1 or PMD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE (that is 512 on a 4K-pages system). Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <redacted>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h index 26016eb9323f..47aa7b01114f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int __pkvm_host_donate_hyp(u64 pfn, u64 nr_pages); int __pkvm_hyp_donate_host(u64 pfn, u64 nr_pages); int __pkvm_host_share_ffa(u64 pfn, u64 nr_pages); int __pkvm_host_unshare_ffa(u64 pfn, u64 nr_pages); -int __pkvm_host_share_guest(u64 pfn, u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, +int __pkvm_host_share_guest(u64 pfn, u64 gfn, u64 nr_pages, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot); int __pkvm_host_unshare_guest(u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vm *hyp_vm); int __pkvm_host_relax_perms_guest(u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c index 59db9606e6e1..4d3d215955c3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ static void handle___pkvm_host_share_guest(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt) { DECLARE_REG(u64, pfn, host_ctxt, 1); DECLARE_REG(u64, gfn, host_ctxt, 2); - DECLARE_REG(enum kvm_pgtable_prot, prot, host_ctxt, 3); + DECLARE_REG(u64, nr_pages, host_ctxt, 3); + DECLARE_REG(enum kvm_pgtable_prot, prot, host_ctxt, 4); struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu; int ret = -EINVAL;@@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ static void handle___pkvm_host_share_guest(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt) if (ret) goto out; - ret = __pkvm_host_share_guest(pfn, gfn, hyp_vcpu, prot); + ret = __pkvm_host_share_guest(pfn, gfn, nr_pages, hyp_vcpu, prot); out: cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = ret; }diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c index 4d269210dae0..f0f7c6f83e57 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c@@ -696,10 +696,9 @@ static enum pkvm_page_state guest_get_page_state(kvm_pte_t pte, u64 addr) return pkvm_getstate(kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte)); } -static int __guest_check_page_state_range(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, +static int __guest_check_page_state_range(struct pkvm_hyp_vm *vm, u64 addr, u64 size, enum pkvm_page_state state) { - struct pkvm_hyp_vm *vm = pkvm_hyp_vcpu_to_hyp_vm(vcpu); struct check_walk_data d = { .desired = state, .get_page_state = guest_get_page_state,@@ -908,48 +907,81 @@ int __pkvm_host_unshare_ffa(u64 pfn, u64 nr_pages) return ret; } -int __pkvm_host_share_guest(u64 pfn, u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, +static int __guest_check_transition_size(u64 phys, u64 ipa, u64 nr_pages, u64 *size) +{ + if (nr_pages == 1) { + *size = PAGE_SIZE; + return 0; + } + + /* We solely support PMD_SIZE huge-pages */ + if (nr_pages != (1 << (PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT))) + return -EINVAL;
I'm not really keen on the whole PxD nomenclature. What we really care about is a mapping level (level 2 in this instance). Can we instead use kvm_granule_size()? Something like: if ((nr_page * PAGE_SIZE) != kvm_granule_size(2)) return -EINVAL;
+ + if (!IS_ALIGNED(phys | ipa, PMD_SIZE)) + return -EINVAL; + + *size = PMD_SIZE;
Similar things here. But also, should this level-2 block checking be moved to the patch that actually allows block mapping? Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.