On Mon, May 12, 2025, at 08:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 12/05/2025 06:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):

  b112d9ffaa65 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")

This is commit

  7dc891191e64 ("ARM: dts: vt8500: use correct ohci/ehci node names")

I will drop mine, but I am surprised that this patch appeared in
arm-soc. soc@ was not Cced on the patchset.

My mistake. I think what happened was that patch 0/5 and 3/5
(the one for spear) of the series were sent to soc@lists.linux.dev:

https://lore.kernel.org/soc/20250330193833.21970-7-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/T/#t (local)

I had some problems with patchwork recently and picked up some of
the missing bits through b4, which always applies the entire
series. I made sure that the patch themselves were ok and I saw
your Reviewed-by tag, but I didn't realize that I was not the
recipient for patches 1, 2, 4 and 5.

      Arnd