Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix bpf selftest build error
From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <hidden>
Date: 2025-05-12 05:26:48
Also in:
bpf, linux-kselftest, linux-next, lkml
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 11:04:55AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Alexei, On Fri, 9 May 2025 10:04:18 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 5:24 AM Saket Kumar Bhaskar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On linux-next, build for bpf selftest displays an error due to mismatch in the expected function signature of bpf_testmod_test_read and bpf_testmod_test_write. Commit 97d06802d10a ("sysfs: constify bin_attribute argument of bin_attribute::read/write()") changed the required type for struct bin_attribute to const struct bin_attribute. To resolve the error, update corresponding signature for the callback. Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <redacted> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e915da49-2b9a-4c4c-a34f-877f378129f6@linux.ibm.com/ (local) Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <redacted> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c index 2e54b95ad898..194c442580ee 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok; noinline ssize_t bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, - struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, + const struct bin_attribute *bin_attr, char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)You didn't even compile it :( Instead of fixing the build, it breaks the build. pw-bot: crThis patch is only needed in linux-next. It should be applied to the driver-core tree - since that includes commit 97d06802d10a. It should also have a Fixes tag referencing commit 97d06802d10a. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Hi Stephen, Apologies for missing the Fixes tag. Would you like me to resend the patch with the Fixes tag included? Thanks, Saket