On Wed, 07 May 2025 14:42:42 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, May 07 2025 at 10:14, Marc Zyngier wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 06 May 2025 16:00:31 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

How does this test distinguish between LEVEL_LOW and LEVEL_HIGH? It only
tests for level, no? So the test is interesting at best ...

There is no distinction between HIGH and LOW, RISING and FALLING, in
any revision of the GIC architecture.

Then pretending that there is a set_type() functionality is pretty daft

You still need to distinguish between level and edge when this is
programmable (which is the case for a subset of the PPIs).

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.