Re: [PATCH] mm: Add ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER to select page block order
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-05-01 14:24:42
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On 1 May 2025, at 1:25, Juan Yescas wrote:
Problem: On large page size configurations (16KiB, 64KiB), the CMA
alignment requirement (CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES) increases considerably,
and this causes the CMA reservations to be larger than necessary.
This means that system will have less available MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE and
MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE page blocks since MIGRATE_CMA can't fallback to them.
The CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES increases because it depends on
MAX_PAGE_ORDER which depends on ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. The value of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER increases on 16k and 64k kernels.
For example, the CMA alignment requirement when:
- CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER default value is used
- CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is set:
PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4KiB | 10 | 10 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 10) = 4MiB
16Kib | 11 | 11 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 11) = 32MiB
64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
There are some extreme cases for the CMA alignment requirement when:
- CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER maximum value is set
- CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is NOT set:
- CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is NOT set
PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4KiB | 15 | 15 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 15) = 128MiB
16Kib | 13 | 13 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 128MiB
64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
This affects the CMA reservations for the drivers. If a driver in a
4KiB kernel needs 4MiB of CMA memory, in a 16KiB kernel, the minimal
reservation has to be 32MiB due to the alignment requirements:
reserved-memory {
...
cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
size = <0x0 0x400000>; /* 4 MiB */
...
};
};
reserved-memory {
...
cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
size = <0x0 0x2000000>; /* 32 MiB */
...
};
};
Solution: Add a new config ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER that
allows to set the page block order. The maximum page block
order will be given by ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.Why not use a boot time parameter to change page block order? Otherwise, you will need to maintain an additional kernel binary for your use case. -- Best Regards, Yan, Zi