On 12/03/2025 12:39, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 11:31, Peter Griffin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for the review feedback.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 19:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 07/03/2025 11:29, Peter Griffin wrote:
quoted
gs101 differs to other SoCs in that fltcon1 register doesn't
always exist. Additionally the offset of fltcon0 is not fixed
and needs to use the newly added eint_fltcon_offset variable.
Fixes: 4a8be01a1a7a ("pinctrl: samsung: Add gs101 SoC pinctrl configuration")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
It looks this depends on previous commit, right?
Yes that's right, it depends on the refactoring in the previous patch.
To fix the bug (which is an Serror on suspend for gs101), we need the
dedicated gs101 callback so it can have the knowledge that fltcon1
doesn't always exist and it's varying offset.
and also dependent on the first patch that adds the eint_fltcon_offset :)
That would be fine because it's a fix as well. Ah, well, let's keep the
dependency, but then I think syntax would be:
Cc: <redacted> # depends on the previous three patches
Best regards,
Krzysztof