Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 6 authors, 2025-04-08

Re: [PATCH v8 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster

From: Nicolin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2025-03-11 17:43:29
Also in: linux-doc, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:57:16PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 09:25:40AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
quoted
Use it to store all vSMMU-related data. The vsid (Virtual Stream ID) will
be the first use case. Since the vsid reader will be the eventq handler
that already holds a streams_mutex, reuse that to fenche the vmaster too.
"fenche"?
fence :)

And I fixed other nits too.
quoted
+int arm_smmu_attach_prepare_vmaster(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
+				    struct arm_smmu_nested_domain *nested_domain)
+{
+	struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster;
+	unsigned long vsid;
+	int ret;
+
+	iommu_group_mutex_assert(state->master->dev);
+
+	/* Skip invalid vSTE */
+	if (!(nested_domain->ste[0] & cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_V)))
+		return 0;
Ok, and we don't need to set 'state->vmaster' in this case because we
only report stage-1 faults back to the vSMMU?
This is a good question that I didn't ask myself hard enough..

I think we should probably drop it. An invalid STE should trigger
a C_BAD_STE event that is in the supported vEVENT list. I'll run
some test before removing this line from v9.
With the nits fixed:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Nicolin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help