Re: [PATCH v11 3/4] arm64: topology: Support SMT control on ACPI based system

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:56:12AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote:

On 2/28/25 20:06, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

Ditto as previous patch, can get rid if it is default 1.

On non-SMT platforms, not calling cpu_smt_set_num_threads() leaves
cpu_smt_num_threads uninitialized to UINT_MAX:

smt/active:0
smt/control:-1

If cpu_smt_set_num_threads() is called:
active:0
control:notsupported

So it might be slightly better to still initialize max_smt_thread_num.

Sure, what I meant is to have max_smt_thread_num set to 1 by default is
that is what needed anyways and the above code does that now.

Why not start with initialised to 1 instead ?
Of course some current logic needs to change around testing it for zero.

I think there would still be a way to check against the default value.
If we have:
unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;

then on a platform with 2 threads, the detection condition would trigger:
xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
    if (entry->thread_num != max_smt_thread_num && max_smt_thread_num)     <---- (entry->thread_num=2) and (max_smt_thread_num=1)
        pr_warn_once("Heterogeneous SMT topology is partly
                      supported by SMT control\n");

so we would need an additional variable:
bool is_initialized = false;

Sure, we could do that or skip the check if max_smt_thread_num == 1 ?

I mean
	if (entry->thread_num != max_smt_thread_num && max_smt_thread_num != 1)

I assume entry->thread_num must be set to 1 on single threaded cores
Won't that work ? Am I missing something still ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep