Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] add function metadata support
From: Menglong Dong <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-28 13:02:48
Also in:
bpf, linux-trace-kernel, lkml, llvm
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 6:26 PM Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 05:53:07PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:quoted
I tested it a little by enabling CFI_CLANG and the extra 5-bytes padding. It works fine, as mostly CFI_CLANG use CONFIG_FUNCTION_PADDING_BYTES to find the tags. I'll do more testing on CFI_CLANG to make sure everything goes well.I don't think you understand; please read: arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:__apply_fineibt() and all the code involved with patching FineIBT. I think you'll find it very broken if you change anything here. Can you post an actual function preamble from a kernel with CONFIG_FINEIBT=y with your changes on? Ex. $ objdump -wdr build/kernel/futex/core.o Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 <__cfi_futex_hash>: 0: b9 93 0c f9 ad mov $0xadf90c93,%ecx 0000000000000005 <.Ltmp0>: 5: 90 nop 6: 90 nop 7: 90 nop 8: 90 nop 9: 90 nop a: 90 nop b: 90 nop c: 90 nop d: 90 nop e: 90 nop f: 90 nop 0000000000000010 <futex_hash>: 10: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 14: e8 00 00 00 00 call 19 <futex_hash+0x9> 15: R_X86_64_PLT32 __fentry__-0x4 19: 8b 47 10 mov 0x10(%rdi),%eax Any change to the layout here *WILL* break the FineIBT code. If you want to test, make sure your build has FINEIBT=y and boot on an Intel CPU that has CET-IBT (alderlake and later).
Yeah, I understand now. As I see the definition of CFI_PRE_PADDING, I know that things is not as simple as I thought, as the layout can be different with different config. I'll dig it deeper on this part. Thanks a lot for clearing that up for me. I'll test the CFI_CLANG and FINEIBT together with this function later. Thanks! Menglong Dong