Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2025-02-28

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: Add support for mt8196

From: Cathy Xu (许华婷) <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-28 08:54:34
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 08:16 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.


On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:11:41AM +0000, Cathy Xu (许华婷) wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 20:26 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
quoted
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
until
you have verified the sender or the content.


On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:16:25 +0800, Cathy Xu wrote:
quoted
Add the new binding document for pinctrl on MediaTek mt8196.

Signed-off-by: Guodong Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Cathy Xu <redacted>
---
 .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-pinctrl.yaml      | 241
++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8196-
pinctrl.yaml
My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your
patch:
  Sorry, this patch depond on another patch:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20250228011702.16493-3-ot_cathy.xu@mediatek.com/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j88RnczPxn7KsWsGgrJFx94TWj7AAkm1F8MLC1hioQUb-zITN_P3YFH3bBgmdo6-2CNyqNqtDPHlLdQkPw$
quoted
  In this case, does the dt-binding still need go first? If so, I
This means your series are non-bisectable but even re-ordering will
nto
fix it. You understand you target different trees?
  Understand.
quoted
will include the dependency information in the commit message of
the next version. Thank you~
No, decouple from dependencies.
  Ok, it will be fixed in next version.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help