Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 5 authors, 2025-02-21

Re: [PATCH v6 13/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report events that belong to devices attached to vIOMMU

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-02-18 18:50:56
Also in: linux-doc, linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 10:28:04AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 01:18:21PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 04:30:42PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
quoted
@@ -1831,31 +1831,30 @@ static int arm_smmu_handle_event(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
There is still the filter at the top:

	switch (event->id) {
	case EVT_ID_TRANSLATION_FAULT:
	case EVT_ID_ADDR_SIZE_FAULT:
	case EVT_ID_ACCESS_FAULT:
	case EVT_ID_PERMISSION_FAULT:
		break;
	default:
		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
	}

Is that right here or should more event types be forwarded to the
guest?
That doesn't seem to be right. Something like EVT_ID_BAD_CD_CONFIG
should be forwarded too. I will go through the list.
I think the above should decode into a 'faultable' path because they
all decode to something with an IOVA

The rest should decode to things that include a SID and the SID decode
should always be forwarded to the VM. Maybe there are small
exclusions, but generally that is how I would see it..
quoted
This already holds the streams_mutex across all of this, do you think
we should get rid of the vmaster_rwsem and hold the streams_mutex on
write instead?
They are per master v.s. per smmu. The latter one would make master
commits/attaches exclusive, which feels unnecessary to me, although
it would make the code here slightly cleaner..
I'd pay the cost on the attach side to have a single lock on the fault
side..

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help