On 2/16/25 11:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/02/2025 10:14, Diederik de Haas wrote:
quoted
quoted
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/clock/samsung,exynos2200.h>
+
+ usb_hsphy: phy@10ab0000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos2200-snps-eusb2-phy";
+ reg = <0 0x10ab0000 0 0x10000>;
+ clocks = <&cmu_hsi0 CLK_MOUT_HSI0_USB32DRD>,
+ <&cmu_hsi0 CLK_MOUT_HSI0_NOC>,
+ <&cmu_hsi0 CLK_DOUT_DIV_CLK_HSI0_EUSB>;
+ clock-names = "ref", "apb", "ctrl";
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ phys = <&usbcon_phy>;
+ };
Shouldn't the example have at least all the *required* properties?
Same for patch 2 of this series.
Yeah, this wasn't ever tested.
Device trees were tested with dtbs_check W=1 but I overlooked testing bindings
with dt_bindings_check. Anyways this is rather a small problem, will be fixed
in a v2.
Best regards,
Ivaylo
Best regards,
Krzysztof