Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 4 authors, 2025-02-19

Re: [PATCH v1 06/13] iommufd: Implement sw_msi support natively

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-02-11 18:16:26
Also in: linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml

On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 01:02:39AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
+static struct iommufd_attach_handle *
+iommu_group_get_iommufd_handle(struct iommu_group *group)
+{
+	struct iommu_attach_handle *handle;
+
+	handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(group, IOMMU_NO_PASID, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(handle))
+		return NULL;
+	return to_iommufd_handle(handle);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called by the irq code if the platform translates the MSI address through the
+ * IOMMU. msi_addr is the physical address of the MSI page. iommufd will
+ * allocate a fd global iova for the physical page that is the same on all
+ * domains and devices.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU
+int iommufd_sw_msi(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct msi_desc *desc,
+		   phys_addr_t msi_addr)
+{
+	struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
+	struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt_paging;
+	struct iommufd_attach_handle *handle;
+	struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *msi_map;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
+	unsigned long iova;
+	int rc;
+
+	handle = iommu_group_get_iommufd_handle(dev->iommu_group);
+	if (!handle)
+		return 0;
I think you should open code this and leave the other function
alone. The locking rules are different here.

iommufd_device_get_attach_handle() should be locked under the
igroup->lock

While in this context we are locked under the iommu core group mutex.

A comment will help

/*
 * It is safe to call iommu_attach_handle_get() here because the iommu
 * core code invokes this under the group mutex which also prevents any
 * change of the attach handle for the duration of this function.
 */
 iommu_group_mutex_assert(dev);

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help