Re: [PATCH v1 06/13] iommufd: Implement sw_msi support natively
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-02-11 18:16:26
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2025-02-11 18:16:26
Also in:
linux-iommu, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, lkml
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 01:02:39AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
+static struct iommufd_attach_handle *
+iommu_group_get_iommufd_handle(struct iommu_group *group)
+{
+ struct iommu_attach_handle *handle;
+
+ handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(group, IOMMU_NO_PASID, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(handle))
+ return NULL;
+ return to_iommufd_handle(handle);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Called by the irq code if the platform translates the MSI address through the
+ * IOMMU. msi_addr is the physical address of the MSI page. iommufd will
+ * allocate a fd global iova for the physical page that is the same on all
+ * domains and devices.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_MSI_IOMMU
+int iommufd_sw_msi(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct msi_desc *desc,
+ phys_addr_t msi_addr)
+{
+ struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
+ struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt_paging;
+ struct iommufd_attach_handle *handle;
+ struct iommufd_sw_msi_map *msi_map;
+ struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
+ unsigned long iova;
+ int rc;
+
+ handle = iommu_group_get_iommufd_handle(dev->iommu_group);
+ if (!handle)
+ return 0;I think you should open code this and leave the other function alone. The locking rules are different here. iommufd_device_get_attach_handle() should be locked under the igroup->lock While in this context we are locked under the iommu core group mutex. A comment will help /* * It is safe to call iommu_attach_handle_get() here because the iommu * core code invokes this under the group mutex which also prevents any * change of the attach handle for the duration of this function. */ iommu_group_mutex_assert(dev); Jason