Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2025-02-11

Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] dt-bindings: firmware: add google,gs101-acpm-ipc

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-11 15:06:11
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On 11/02/2025 14:29, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 1:05 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 11/02/2025 13:02, André Draszik wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 11:57 +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
quoted
And then I shall s/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");/MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");/
everywhere as "GPL" indicates [GNU Public License v2 or later].
No, please don't, see Documentation/process/license-rules.rst.
For the rest of suggestions here I also recommend rereading docs. I
don't get why we need to change "GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause", but maybe I
miss some docs. Whatever SPDX recommends is irrelevant if kernel
recommends for example something else, so be sure you make it aligned
with actual kernel preference.
Unfortunately, ``Documentation/process/license-rules.rst`` and
``LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0`` are not in 'sync', but I guess that's
(potentially) a discussion for another ML.

TL;DR: ``license-rules.rst`` says "GPL-2.0" while the license file
allows both.

What exactly is there not in sync? To me it shows the preferred GPL-2.0,
over GPL-2.0-only.

LICENSES has licenses and all SPDX tags. license-rules for
simplification uses only some and the ones there could be understood as
preferred. Probably this should be changed first.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help