Re: [PATCH 1/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: fix MPLL_MULTIPLIER and SSC_REFCLKSEL masks in refclk
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-05 08:53:28
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-phy, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:10:12AM +0530, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
In exynos5_usbdrd_{pipe3,utmi}_set_refclk(), the masks
PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK and PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK are not
inverted when applied to the register values. Fix it.
Fixes: 59025887fb08 ("phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver")Missing Cc-stable and this should be sent separately.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <redacted> --- drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c index c421b495eb0fe4396d76f8c9d7c198ad7cd08869..4a108fdab118c0edd76bd88dc9dbf6a498e064b3 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c@@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ exynos5_usbdrd_pipe3_set_refclk(struct phy_usb_instance *inst) reg |= PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_EXT_REFCLK; /* FSEL settings corresponding to reference clock */ - reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_FSEL_PIPE_MASK | - PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK | - PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK; + reg &= ~(PHYCLKRST_FSEL_PIPE_MASK | + PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK | + PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK); switch (phy_drd->extrefclk) { case EXYNOS5_FSEL_50MHZ: reg |= (PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_50M_REF |@@ -532,9 +532,9 @@ exynos5_usbdrd_utmi_set_refclk(struct phy_usb_instance *inst) reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_MASK; reg |= PHYCLKRST_REFCLKSEL_EXT_REFCLK; - reg &= ~PHYCLKRST_FSEL_UTMI_MASK | - PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK | - PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK; + reg &= ~(PHYCLKRST_FSEL_UTMI_MASK | + PHYCLKRST_MPLL_MULTIPLIER_MASK | + PHYCLKRST_SSC_REFCLKSEL_MASK); reg |= PHYCLKRST_FSEL(phy_drd->extrefclk);
This part does not set MPLL_MULTIPLIER and SSC_REFCLKSEL fields later, but I also assume intention was to clear the fields. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted> Best regards, Krzysztof