Re: [PATCH v2] ahci: st: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-01-10 12:02:53
Also in:
linux-ide, lkml
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-01-10 12:02:53
Also in:
linux-ide, lkml
On 1/10/25 20:23, Niklas Cassel wrote:
quoted
quoted
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static int st_ahci_suspend(struct device *dev) { struct ata_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);@@ -221,9 +220,8 @@ static int st_ahci_resume(struct device *dev) return ahci_platform_resume_host(dev); } -#endifI do not think you can remove the ifdef here. Otherwise, there is going to be a compilation warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled. No ?Look at the pm_sleep_ptr macro: include/linux/pm.h:#define pm_sleep_ptr(_ptr) PTR_IF(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP), (_ptr)) I would expect the function should be optimized out by the compiler using dead code elimination.
Indeed. Just tried and no warning. I was expecting a "defined but not used" warning, but none showed up. So all good.
Raphael, perhaps you could show the before and after output using ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ? (When the config is not enabled: before and after your patch.)
No need to do that I guess. But there are 17 other ata driver that set .pm operations. What about these ? Don't they need the same treatment as ahci_st ? 15 of these also use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() which can be replaced with DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() also, no ? Do you want us to do that cleanup ? (fine with me). -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research