Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] net: ti: prueth: Adds ICSSM Ethernet driver
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2025-01-09 16:00:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml, netdev
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2025-01-09 16:00:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml, netdev
+ emac->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(eth_node, "phy-handle", 0);
+ if (!emac->phy_node) {
+ dev_err(prueth->dev, "couldn't find phy-handle\n");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto free;
+ }
+
+ ret = of_get_phy_mode(eth_node, &emac->phy_if);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(prueth->dev, "could not get phy-mode property err %d\n",
+ ret);
+ goto free;
+ }
+
+ /* connect PHY */
+ emac->phydev = of_phy_connect(ndev, emac->phy_node,
+ &icssm_emac_adjust_link, 0, emac->phy_if);
+ if (!emac->phydev) {
+ dev_dbg(prueth->dev, "couldn't connect to phy %s\n",
+ emac->phy_node->full_name);
+ ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto free;
+ }of_phy_get_and_connect() will simplify this.
+ /* remove unsupported modes */ + phy_remove_link_mode(emac->phydev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT); + phy_remove_link_mode(emac->phydev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT);
It only does 100Mbps?
+ if (of_property_read_bool(eth_node, "ti,no-half-duplex")) {Is this becasue 100baseT_Half is broken in some versions of the hardware?
+ phy_remove_link_mode(emac->phydev, + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT); + } + + phy_remove_link_mode(emac->phydev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Pause_BIT); + phy_remove_link_mode(emac->phydev, ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_Asym_Pause_BIT);
Is this really needed? I've not checked, but if you don't call phy_support_sym_pause() or phy_support_asym_pause(), i would of expected phylib to default to no pause?
+static const struct of_device_id prueth_dt_match[];
Please avoid forward references. If you need the match table, define it here. Andrew