Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one
From: Barry Song <hidden>
Date: 2025-01-06 20:52:41
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 3:40 AM Lance Yang [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:34 PM Baolin Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2025/1/6 17:03, Barry Song wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 7:40 PM Baolin Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2025/1/6 11:17, Barry Song wrote:quoted
From: Barry Song <redacted> The refcount may be temporarily or long-term increased, but this does not change the fundamental nature of the folio already being lazy- freed. Therefore, we only reset 'swapbacked' when we are certain the folio is dirty and not droppable. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <redacted>The changes look good to me. While we are at it, could you also change the __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked() to follow the same strategy for lazy-freed PMD-sized folio?it seems you mean __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked() is lacking folio_set_swapbacked(folio) for dirty pmd-mapped folios?Good catch! Hmm... I don't recall why we don't call folio_set_swapbacked for dirty THPs in __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked() - possibly to align with previous behavior ;) If a dirty PMD-mapped THP cannot be discarded, we just split it and restart the page walk to process the PTE-mapped THP. After that, we will only mark each folio within the THP as swap-backed individually. It seems like we could cut the work by calling folio_set_swapbacked() for dirty THPs directly in __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), skipping the restart of the page walk after splitting the THP, IMHO ;)
Yes, the existing code for PMD-mapped THPs seems quite inefficient. It splits
the PMD-mapped THP into smaller folios, marks each split PTE as dirty, and
then iterates over each PTE. I’m not sure why it’s designed this way—could
there be a specific reason behind this approach?
However, it does appear to handle folio_set_swapbacked() correctly, as only
a dirty PMD will result in dirty PTEs being generated in
__split_huge_pmd_locked():
} else {
pte_t entry;
entry = mk_pte(page, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot));
if (write)
entry = pte_mkwrite(entry, vma);
if (!young)
entry = pte_mkold(entry);
/* NOTE: this may set soft-dirty too on some archs */
if (dirty)
entry = pte_mkdirty(entry);
if (soft_dirty)
entry = pte_mksoft_dirty(entry);
if (uffd_wp)
entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
for (i = 0; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++)
VM_WARN_ON(!pte_none(ptep_get(pte + i)));
set_ptes(mm, haddr, pte, entry, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
}
Thanks, Lancequoted
quoted
and it seems !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE) is also not handled properly?quoted
Right.
Thanks Barry