Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx: support DMA defer probing
From: Carlos Song <hidden>
Date: 2024-11-27 02:17:36
Also in:
imx, linux-i2c, lkml
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2024 6:24 PM To: Carlos Song <redacted> Cc: Frank Li <frank.li@nxp.com>; o.rempel@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de; andi.shyti@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx: support DMA defer probing On 26.11.2024 10:15:27, Carlos Song wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
static void i2c_imx_dma_callback(void *arg) @@ -1803,6 +1804,13 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) goto clk_notifier_unregister; + /* Init DMA config if supported */ + ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr); + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DMA not ready, go defer probe!\n"); + goto clk_notifier_unregister; + }Don't spam the logs if the driver defers probing, it's not a error. And it looks strange to ignore all other errors here. Either add a comment here, something like "continue without DMA", or let the function return 0 in case the driver should continue and propagate the error if the caller should take care of it.Hi, Thank you for your suggestion! I agree with you. I will change to this logic: ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr); if (ret) { if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) goto clk_notifier_unregister; dev_info(&pdev->dev, "use pio mode\n"); } Ret = 0 -----> enable DMA successfully -------> no print Ret!=0 -----> defer probe ---------> no print and try again Ret!=0 -----> fail to enable DMA ------> remind now is using pio mode Do you think the logic is acceptable?Yes, the other option is to move the logic into i2c_imx_dma_request() and let it return 0 in case of DMA or fallback to PIO, or an error in case of probe defer or a fatal error. This way the probe function will look like this: ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr); if (ret) return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to setup DMA\n");Sorry, I have some different ideas... 1. DMA mode should be optional for i2c-imx, because i2c-imx can accept DMAmode not enabled, because it still can work in CPU mode. ACKquoted
If we use return dev_err_probe(), we have to return error ati2c_imx_dma_request() for "some fatal error", it will cause i2c_adapter can not be registered, then kill i2c adapter register. i2c_imx_dma_request should only return an error if PIO mode is not an option.quoted
If we always return 0 at i2c_imx_dma_request(), dev_err_probe will notwork forever. So from my point, if DMA is not working well, just output a log to remind now i2c is alwaysquoted
working at CPU mode, we have no DMA, this is enough.ACKquoted
2. when really defer probe, return dev_err_probe will return defer probedirectly, but we still need to goto clk_notifier_unregister branch to free irq, clk_notifier_unregister and disable runtime pm.quoted
So we still need more judgement at probe function to handle this.Not quite "dev_err_probe()" will not defer probe directly, the return in "return dev_err_probe();" does. This should work: ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr); if (ret) { dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to setup DMA\n"); goto clk_notifier_unregister; }quoted
So I prefer this logic:This also works, LGTM!
I will apply it in V3. Thank you for your ack!
quoted
ret = i2c_imx_dma_request(i2c_imx, phy_addr); if (ret) { if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) goto clk_notifier_unregister; dev_info(&pdev->dev, "use pio mode\n"); }regards, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |