Hi Krzysztof,

On 19:06 Thu 31 Oct     , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 31/10/2024 15:20, Andrea della Porta wrote:

quoted

Hi Krzysztof,

On 08:28 Tue 29 Oct     , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 03:07:20PM +0100, Andrea della Porta wrote:

quoted

Common YAML schema for devices that exports internal peripherals through
PCI BARs. The BARs are exposed as simple-buses through which the
peripherals can be accessed.

This is not intended to be used as a standalone binding, but should be
included by device specific bindings.

Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@suse.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml   | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e532621f226b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/pci-ep-bus.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Common Properties for PCI MFD Endpoints with Peripherals Addressable from BARs
+
+maintainers:
+  - Andrea della Porta  <andrea.porta@suse.com>
+
+description:
+  Define a generic node representing a PCI endpoint which contains several sub-
+  peripherals. The peripherals can be accessed through one or more BARs.
+  This common schema is intended to be referenced from device tree bindings, and

Please wrap code according to coding style (checkpatch is not a coding
style description but only a tool).

Above applies to all places here and other bindings.

Are you referring to the title being longer than 80 column here, right?
Because the description seems correctly wrapped... or should I add a
newline for each paragraph?

Hmm, I might commented on wrong description. I just looked at patch #2
and there it's passed 80.

Here the title is not wrapped.

Ack.

Many thanks,
Andrea

Best regards,
Krzysztof