RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: update esdhc sysctl dtocv bitmask
From: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Date: 2024-10-31 02:37:16
Also in:
imx, linux-mmc, lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Josua Mayer <redacted> Sent: 2024年10月30日 21:44 To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; Bough Chen [off-list ref]; Ulf Hansson [off-list ref]; Shawn Guo [off-list ref]; Sascha Hauer [off-list ref]; Pengutronix Kernel Team [off-list ref]; Fabio Estevam [off-list ref] Cc: Mikhail Anikin <redacted>; Jon Nettleton [off-list ref]; yazan.shhady [off-list ref]; Rabeeh Khoury [off-list ref]; imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; dl-S32 [off-list ref]; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: update esdhc sysctl dtocv bitmask Am 30.10.24 um 14:37 schrieb Josua Mayer:quoted
NXP ESDHC supports setting data timeout using uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL register DTOCV bits (bits 16-19). Currently the driver accesses those bits by 32-bit write using SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL (0x2E) defined in drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h. This is offset by two bytes relative to uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL (0x2C). The driver also defines ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK as first 4 bits, which is correct relative to SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL but not relative to uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL. The definition carrying control register in its name is therefore inconsistent. Update the bitmask definition for bits 16-19 to be correct relative to control register base. Update the esdhc_set_timeout function to set timeout value at control register base, not timeout offset. This solves a purely cosmetic problem. Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <redacted> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.cb/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c indexa830d9a9490408d3148b927bf1acc719a13e8975..101feabb24fb41bd10a2e796f 4f3quoted
f8d4357dc245 100644--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c@@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ #include "sdhci-esdhc.h" #include "cqhci.h" -#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK 0x0f #define ESDHC_CTRL_D3CD 0x08 #define ESDHC_BURST_LEN_EN_INCR (1 << 27) #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL 0x2c +#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK GENMASK(19, 16) #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N BIT(23) /* VENDOR SPEC register */ #define ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC 0xc0@@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static void esdhc_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host*host, struct mmc_command *cmd) /* use maximum timeout counter */ esdhc_clrset_le(host, ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK, - esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data) ? 0xF : 0xE, + esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data) ? 0x0F0000 : 0x0E0000, SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL);^^ There is a mistake here, intended: ESDHC_SYS_CTRL (I changed that last second while writing commit description :( )
Yes, please fix this. Regards Haibo Chen
quoted
}