On 9/20/2024 6:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 20/09/2024 13:56, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: qcom,ipq5424-gcc

So everything i sthe same as 5332? Why not adding it there?

infact, ipq5332 has 1 dual lane and 1 single lane pcie, whereas
ipq5424 has 2 dual lane and 2 single lane pcie. will update the
bindings in v2 accordingly.

Hm? What is the difference in the bindings? I don't see. Maybe some diff
would help.

For IPQ5424, clocks items is like this

       - description: Board XO clock source
       - description: Sleep clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane PHY0 pipe clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane PHY1 pipe clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane PHY2 pipe clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane PHY3 pipe clock source
       - description: USB PCIE wrapper pipe clock source


For IPQ5332, its like this,

       - description: Board XO clock source
       - description: Sleep clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane PHY pipe clock source
       - description: PCIE 2lane x1 PHY pipe clock source
       - description: USB PCIE wrapper pipe clock source

So for IPQ5424, there are 2 additional PCI phy's.

So would it be fine to add the new IPQ5424 compatible to
IPQ5322 file itself with a 'if:' of compatibles ?

Regards,
  Sricharan