Re: [PATCH v2] SLUB: Add support for per object memory policies
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@gentwo.org>
Date: 2024-09-12 16:40:20
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml, oe-kbuild-all
On Sun, 8 Sep 2024, kernel test robot wrote:
config: sparc64-randconfig-r121-20240907 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409080304.haF25cFZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)quoted
quoted
mm/slub.c:222:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'strict_numa' was not declared. Should it be static?
Ummm.. This code declares strict_numa. Whats wrong with sparc64 / sparse ?
vim +/strict_numa +222 mm/slub.c 220 221 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > 222 DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(strict_numa); 223 #endif 224