On 9/4/2024 5:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:

quoted

Add support for PIL loading on ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP on QCS8300
platform.

Co-developed-by: Xin Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <redacted>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
index ef82835e98a4..f92ccd4921b7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c

@@ -1416,6 +1416,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id adsp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-adsp-pas", .data = &adsp_resource_init },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pas", .data = &cdsp_resource_init },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404-wcss-pas", .data = &wcss_resource_init },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-adsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_adsp_resource},
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-cdsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_cdsp0_resource},
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-gpdsp-pas", .data = &sa8775p_gpdsp0_resource},

What's the point of this? You have entire commit msg to explain such
weird duplication. Otherwise sorry, don't duplicate unnecessarily.
Devices are compatible, aren't they?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

I will drop this, could you please help us to understand what is the correct way to
deal such situation, do we need to update the yaml and add qcs8300 bindings or just
reference to sa8775p bindings in the device tree?

Thanks,
Jingyi