Thread (95 messages) 95 messages, 8 authors, 2024-10-17

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Report IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for CANWBS

From: Nicolin Chen <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-27 20:13:59
Also in: kvm, linux-acpi, linux-iommu, linux-patches

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:51:35PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
HW with CANWBS is always cache coherent and ignores PCI No Snoop requests
as well. This meets the requirement for IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY,
so let's return it.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <redacted>

With two very ignorable nits:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -2693,6 +2718,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_prepare(struct arm_smmu_attach_state *state,
 		 * one of them.
 		 */
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);
+		if (smmu_domain->enforce_cache_coherency &&
+		    !(dev_iommu_fwspec_get(master->dev)->flags &
+		      IOMMU_FWSPEC_PCI_RC_CANWBS)) {
How about a small dev_enforce_cache_coherency() helper?
+			kfree(master_domain);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock,
+					       flags);
+			return -EINVAL;
kfree() doesn't need to be locked.

Thanks
Nicolin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help