RE: [PATCH 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Support CANWBS memory access flag

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2024 3:59 PM
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <redacted>
Cc: acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev; Alex Williamson
[off-list ref]; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
[off-list ref]; iommu@lists.linux.dev; Joerg Roedel
[off-list ref]; Kevin Tian [off-list ref]; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
Len Brown [off-list ref]; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel@lists.infradead.org; Lorenzo Pieralisi [off-list ref]; Rafael J.
Wysocki [off-list ref]; Robert Moore [off-list ref]; Robin
Murphy [off-list ref]; Sudeep Holla [off-list ref];
Will Deacon [off-list ref]; Eric Auger [off-list ref]; Jean-
Philippe Brucker [off-list ref]; Moritz Fischer [off-list ref];
Michael Shavit [off-list ref]; Nicolin Chen [off-list ref];
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ACPI/IORT: Support CANWBS memory access flag

On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 02:36:31PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ struct acpi_iort_memory_access {

 #define ACPI_IORT_MF_COHERENCY          (1)
 #define ACPI_IORT_MF_ATTRIBUTES         (1<<1)
+#define ACPI_IORT_MF_CANWBS             (1<<2)

I think we need to update Document number to E.f in IORT section in
this file. Also isn't it this file normally gets updated through ACPICA pull ?

I don't know anything about the ACPI process..

Can someone say for sure what to do here?

From past experience, it is normally sending a PULL request to here,
https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pulls

And I think it then gets merged by Robert Moore and then send to LKML.

Thanks,
Shameer