Am Dienstag, 13. August 2024, 18:38:58 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
On 04/08/2024 16:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 04/08/2024 15:20, Yao Zi wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ compatible = "fixed-clock";
+ #clock-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+ clock-output-names = "xin24m";
+ };
+
+ gic: interrupt-controller@fed01000 {
Why this all is outside of SoC?
Just as Heiko says, device tree for all other Rockchip SoCs don't have
a "soc" node. I didn't know why before but just follow the style.
If you prefer add a soc node, I am willing to.
Surprising as usually we expect MMIO nodes being part of SoC to be under
soc@, but if that's Rockchip preference then fine.
One more comment, I forgot we actually have it documented long time ago:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst#L90
Thanks for finding that block.
I guess we'll follow that advice then and go with a soc node :-) .
Heiko