On 17:22-20240812, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:20:56 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote:

quoted

quoted

If the net maintainers are OK, they could potentially take the binding
patch along with the driver mods corresponding to this - I am a bit
unsure of picking up a binding if the driver implementation is heading
the wrong way.   

Hi Jakub, Paolo, David, Andrew,

Will it be okay to pick this binding patch to net-next tree. Nishant is
suggesting since the driver changes are done in drivers/net/ the binding
can be picked by net maintainers.

Please let us know if it will be okay to take this binding to net-next.
I can post a new series with just the binding and the driver patch to
net-next if needed.

Nishanth, could you send an official Ack tag?

Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>

Thanks Jakub.

No problem with merging it via net-next.
On the code itself you may want to use ethtool_puts().

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D